But here's why it might be worth it.
Is the obvious explanation always true? Does that make sense?
Otherwise, the mobile phone conversation can swerve too close to baseless so far conspiracy theories that seem more fiction than fact.
I have draw no conclusions, just a feeling. Which I realize probably has no scientific merit. I have a fairly organized mind as well. Do you have any conclusive evidence in a different direction. Not sure about the echo chamber comment. I am open to any explanation on this topic.
If anyone has thoughts, theoriesor concrete evidenceplease post. Mobile phones are being used to control people in some way Requirement 1: Wifi or telecoms signals must be emitted which affect the human brain in a specific way as to result in a change of behaviour Requirement 2: The resultant change is desired by some group or organization.
The link must be complex or just a few non-conspiracy member experts in X waves, communication or the human brain would realise and announce their findings. Mobile phone technology seems like a reasonable development alongside other technologies which have emerged radios, computers etc.
If behavioural changes are made by radio waves we would expect to see early experimenters with this technology reporting such behaviours. If small behavioural changes are being made by mobile phone use then would we see large changes around intense signals?
Beyond mobile phones themselves large amounts of radio and wifi signals are not considered hazardous, Radar has been used for decades and you can approach a radar tower without any special protection or ill effects.
Areas of high intensity wifi signals likewise apartment blocks where every apartment has wifi, internet cafes etc are not associated with seizures or strange behaviours. This does not preclude a non-radio or wifi signal being emitted by phones but a special hidden radiation seems like a stretch.
The change would need to be subtle enough not to be noticed and large enough to be worth a considerable expenditure of resources and risk. We need something testable! Radio and wifi signals i would suggest are well understood by a large number of groups from doctors to engineers to operatives in a number of fields.
If radio or wifi signals DID effect changes in the human brain there would be applications for this in a variety of fields. Perhaps cures for some cognitive disorder or behavioural illnesses. Could we look to cure diseases?
Could we use such signals to calm rioters or increase spending in shops? I would like to share a simple mantra which I use when faced with any supernatural phenomenon. I think this may, and hopefully will, offer some insight into the cell phone conundrum.
This was previously posted under Major Memories and seems to fit well here.Ever loved a book or story, and been unable to find another quite like it? Maybe we at Magic Dragon Multimedia can help to steer you in the right direction.
A stampede of religious pilgrims in a pedestrian tunnel in Mecca leaves more than 1, people dead on this day in This was the most deadly of .
Latest breaking news, including politics, crime and celebrity. Find stories, updates and expert opinion.
Sep 17, · The impossible space drive really is impossible. Most people miss the fact that NASA also tested a “dummy drive” which was the same in every way but . Stephen Hawking was the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge for thirty years, and has been the recipient of numerous awards and honors including, most recently, the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
His books for the general reader include the classic A Brief History of Time, Black Holes and Baby Universes and Other Essays, The Universe in a Nutshell, and A Briefer.
Brain Pickings remains free (and ad-free) and takes me hundreds of hours a month to research and write, and thousands of dollars to sustain..
If you find any joy and value in what I do, please consider becoming a Sustaining Patron with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good lunch.