Observe the rules of netiquette. Do not send messages that are deliberately hostile and insulting to other users.
Cooperation with Disciplinary Authorities. Giving Precedence to the Duties of Judicial Office. A judge shall uphold and apply the law, and shall perform all duties of judicial office fairly and impartially.
This comment is not intended to restrict the appropriate functions of the courts in statutory or common law review.
Errors of this kind do not violate this Rule. Bias, Prejudice, and Harassment. A A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office, including administrative duties, without bias or prejudice. C A judge shall require lawyers in proceedings before the court to refrain from manifesting bias or prejudice, or engaging in harassment, based upon attributes including but not limited to race, sex, gender identity or expression, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, Group code of conduct status, socioeconomic status, or political affiliation, against parties, witnesses, lawyers, or others.
D The restrictions of paragraphs B and C do not preclude judges or lawyers from making legitimate reference to the listed factors, or similar factors, when they are relevant to an issue in a proceeding. Even facial expressions and body language can convey to parties and lawyers in the proceeding, jurors, the media, and others an appearance of bias or prejudice.
A judge must avoid conduct that may reasonably be perceived as prejudiced or biased. External Influences on Judicial Conduct.
A A judge shall not be swayed by public clamor or fear of criticism. C A judge shall not convey or permit others to convey the impression that any person or organization is in a position to influence the judge. Confidence in the judiciary is eroded if judicial decision making is perceived to be subject to inappropriate outside influences.
Competence, Diligence and Cooperation. A A judge shall perform judicial and administrative duties competently and diligently. B A judge shall cooperate with other judges and court officials in the administration of court business.
The obligation of this Rule includes, for example, the accurate, timely and complete compliance with the requirements of Pa.
A judge should monitor and supervise cases in ways that reduce or eliminate dilatory practices, avoidable delays, and unnecessary costs.
Ensuring the Right to Be Heard. B A judge may encourage parties to a proceeding and their lawyers to settle matters in dispute but shall not act in a manner that coerces any party into settlement.
Substantive rights of litigants can be protected only if procedures protecting the right to be heard are observed. Among the factors that a judge should consider when deciding upon an appropriate settlement procedure for a case are 1 whether the parties have requested or voluntarily consented to a certain level of participation by the judge in settlement discussions, 2 whether the parties and their counsel are relatively sophisticated in legal matters, 3 whether the case will be tried by the judge or a jury, 4 whether the parties participate with their counsel in settlement discussions, 5 whether any parties are unrepresented by counsel, and 6 whether the matter is civil or criminal.
A judge shall hear and decide matters assigned to the judge, except where the judge has recused himself or herself or when disqualification is required by Rule 2. Although there are times when disqualification or recusal is necessary to protect the rights of litigants and preserve public confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, judges must be available to decide matters that come before the courts.
Unwarranted disqualification or recusal may bring public disfavor to the court and to the judge personally. However, there may be instances where a judge is disqualified from presiding over a particular matter or shall recuse himself or herself from doing so.
A judge is disqualified from presiding over a matter when a specified disqualifying fact or circumstance is present. The concept of recusal envisioned in this Rule overlaps with disqualification.
In addition, however, a judge may recuse himself or herself from presiding over a matter even in the absence of a disqualifying fact or circumstance where—in the exercise of discretion, in good faith, and with due consideration for the general duty to hear and decide matters—the judge concludes that prevailing facts and circumstances could engender a substantial question in reasonable minds as to whether disqualification nonetheless should be required.
Decorum, Demeanor, and Communication with Jurors.The Tata Code of Conduct is comprehensive document that serves as the ethical road map for Tata employees and companies and provides the guidelines by which the group conducts its businesses. THE BNP PARIBAS GROUP CODE OF CONDUCT A Mission and Values 11 To live by our Values and achieve our Mission, we must be prepared to make courageous choices and decisions.
The Group is committed to improve continuously: > Address the clients’ needs in . Always follow both the letter and spirit of the law. If following the Code causes you to violate local law, follow local law.
However, if a conflict arises between local custom and the Code, follow the Code. UnitedHealth Group Code of Conduct: Our Principles of Ethics & Integrity 4 Violations of the Code of Conduct and Policies 4 Waiver and Changes to the Code 4.
Followings are the contents of 'Suzuki Group Code of Conduct' that Suzuki Motor Corporation is communicating to all directors, officers and employees of Suzuki Group.
1 Salon Media Group, Inc. Code of Conduct and Policy Regarding Reporting of Possible Violations Salon Media Group, Inc. (the “Company” or “Salon”) is committed to being a good corporate.